Harvard医科大の驚きの発見である、南方および南米先住民（ＤＮＡシグナルPopulation-Y）に見られる東アジア基層（BEA：Basal East Asian / オーストララシア親和性含む）の遺伝的類縁性と北米に痕跡が見られないことは、従来の「乾燥したシベリア内陸のマンモスハンターがベリンジアを越え北米先住民とＤＮＡ類縁」とする定説に対する決定的ともいえる反証である。
The White Sands footprints prove a coastal migration route to the Americas. So who actually walked it? Mainstream academia keeps looping the same broken debate, ignoring the obvious:
🛑 The Inland Mismatch: Tianyuan Man was an inland hill dweller, completely lacking maritime technology. Meanwhile, Siberian lineages are genetically incompatible with South America’s founding Population-Y. The “Northern Land Route” models have collapsed.
🛶 The Only Viable Candidate: 38,000 years ago, Japan’s Ancient Izu Seafarers possessed the highly developed “Archipelago OS.” They were already conducting the world’s earliest organized seafaring voyages (with crossings up to 20km) for obsidian trade. Along with the 36,000-year-old Okinawa seafaring remains, the evidence points to one launching pad: the Japanese Archipelago.
Stop looking at Siberia. The coastal route belongs to the advanced mariners of the Northwest Pacific. 🗺️ #Anthropology #AncientHistory #OutofJapan #FirstAmericans
１．The genetic affinity between southern Australasians (Aborigines) and Amazonian tribes suggests that human dispersal followed a clockwise coastal route, as Harvard ‘s discovery and evidenced by fossil “footprints” .
２．It is crucial that neither Tianyuan man nor the “Ancestral/Sojin” lineages (ancestors of the Jomon people, related to the Onge)—both belonging to the Basal East Asian (BEA) wave—have been discovered in North America; they were likely overwritten and erased by the subsequent influx of the Siberian Mal’ta lineage.
３．Since the Siberian ANA (Ancient Northeast Asians) could not have transitioned into a maritime population, the ancient South American Population- Y is theoretically most likely derived from the Japanese ” Sojin” lineages migrating southward along the coast.
