現在の欧米主導の学界は、ヤナRHS遺跡(約3.2万年前)に代表されるシベリア狩猟民と東アジア田園Tianyuan洞人の系統が融合して生まれたANA(Ancient North Asians)集団が、「マンモス追って進入」定説が崩れた今も、ベリンジアで「海民化」して新大陸西海岸を南下したというモデルに留まっています。しかし、このモデルは南米(アマゾンなど全域)の先住民にのみ検出され、北米では発見されない「Population-Y(オーストララシア/東アジア古層BEAのDNAシグナル)」という偏在を説明できません。もしANAがフネで北米沿岸を南下し内陸にも拡散したのならば、北米にPop-Yが全く残っていないのは遺伝統計学的にアリエマセン。
Inland big-game hunters cannot just drop their mega-spears and instantly “evolve” into master mariners to settle the Americas. It’s an evolutionary impossibility! The true pioneers? The 38k-year-old Izu Sojin with their advanced “Archipelago OS.”
🧠 Paradigm Shift: The Evolutionary Impossibility of the Western Migration Model “The conventional ‘Siberian-centric’ paradigm is untenable. The population in question represented an inland terrestrial lineage, entirely distinct from maritime cultures. The hypothesis that inland big-game hunters could abruptly abandon their specialized lithic weaponry to adopt an advanced coastal lifestyle is evolutionarily implausible. Rather, the primary candidates for this early migration are the Izu Sojin lineage of 38,000 BP, who carried the crucial ‘Archipelago OS’ required for open-ocean navigation.”
Let’s look at the actual technological compatibility.